What is DCTCRS

News

Reports

Studies

Compaign

Contact Us

ÚÑÈí

ãÌáÉ ãÞÇÑÈÇÊ

 


 

 

A Constitutional Test for the Concept of the American Nation -  Sobhi Ghandour*

 

The United States has entered the final countdown to November 4th, the day when Americans will vote not only a new President into power, but also a third of the Senate and the entire House of Representatives, in addition to electing local officials across the nation.
     November 4th is not just a key date in the US calendar; it is also a watershed in the history of American politics, because whichever presidential candidate wins, whether Democrat or Republican, will create a very important precedent. 

An Obama-Biden Presidency would shatter a longstanding racial barrier in the United States, marking the first time in history that a black man or individual of African descent has attained the office of the President in the White House.  A McCain-Palin Presidency would also create a brand new precedent, smashing the social-cultural barriers that so far have prevented women from reaching the highest office in the land. 

Both cases herald a departure from the traditional and familiar, but both cases also reinforce the US Constitution in the best possible light, rather than deviate from it.

The Constitution gives any American citizen (under very few conditions) the right to be elected to power, regardless of their religion, gender, or ethnicity.  These rights are enshrined in other beautifully worded constitutions around the world, but reality often stops at political will and constitutional objectives have so often been obstructed by national customs or traditions.

This is also the case with heaven-sent or divine guidance to mankind, where we often witness a big difference between the content, spirit, and messages of sacred texts and the practices that are generated in their name!
     Barack Obama’s nomination for the Presidency was the result of many long months of a popular selection process, pitting him in tough competition against other Democratic party candidates, most notably Hillary Clinton.  His candidacy -- a call for change by the general population -- was not a decision made (or vetoed) by a single person or the most senior individuals in his party, as occurred with the selection of Vice Presidential candidate for the Republican party, Sarah Palin, who also represents a change.
    In other words, millions of black and white Americans actively chose Barack Obama at the polls to be their candidate for the US Presidency, encouraging the development of a new understanding of the meaning of democratic participation and national involvement.  At the same time, it crossed a psychological barrier, putting behind Americans a tradition of racist and unjust discrimination between fellow countrymen.

Several challenges continue to face this new ‘phenomenon’ on the national scene and Barack Obama’s road to the White House.  There is a deep sense of racial prejudice in segments of American society which are distrustful of Obama’s African roots and hostile in questioning his religious identity, due to the fact that the father he barely knew had Islamic roots.  Other factors challenging an historic ascendancy would relate to Obama’s political and social policies, which contradict much of the ideology of the Religious Right, which holds sway over approximately one fifth of Americans.  In addition, there is a traditional but widening political divide between ‘Democrats’ and ‘Republicans’ and each side’s adopted health, social, and economic political program.  These programs directly affect the interests of giant US corporations and dictate the activities of corporate lobbyists in Washington, whose leverage with politicians affects American lives because they influence US lawmakers.      

Some important new elements that have emerged for the first time have had a positive impact on this presidential campaign and have benefitted Obama.  Firstly, there is the organizational power of the student generation, many of whom are volunteers or activists in the Obama campaign; secondly there are new immigrants to the U.S. who typically have avoided involvement in political elections, but see in Obama a model for their children to emulate of genuine participation in American society and affairs.  Barack Obama is the son of an immigrant to America born in Kenya.

 
     The third influential factor is the large number of Americans in general and specifically black Americans, who have traditionally avoided exercising their constitutional right to vote or becoming involved in fighting for the right to vote.  This has always diminished their influence with the candidates and in the electoral process, because, as they saw it, whichever candidate has won the presidency has rarely changed their lives or living conditions for the better. Many now have hope that Barak Obama will represent them in the highest decision-making office of the land.  Many see in him a direct comparison with the late President John F. Kennedy who, as a Catholic also belonged to a minority, in his case religious, and who also attained the Presidency in his early forties and used his time in power to work for political and social change before his assassination in 1963.

Barack Obama’s strong appeal and support among Americans comes at a time in US politics when there is widespread discontent with President Bush’s Republican Administration.  The US economy is experiencing a series of crises from which it might not recover.  The war in Iraq has proven Obama’s political judgment correct with regard to calling the war a mistake and having no relation to a “War on Terror”; rather it has deepened America’s economic problems and created many new negatives for US foreign policy.

Obama Campaign supporters have been asking a lot of questions about John McCain’s candidacy since the Republican convention.  The Republican Party message shifted its focus to “Change and Reform,” but it does not criticize the current Republican Administration of President Bush, nor its actions at home or abroad.  It is almost as though the incumbent presidency is not Republican nor even exists.

With regard to Iraq, the question that needs to be asked is not what is happening now, nor how long will it take for the US policies there to succeed, but why was there a war in the first place?  What results has this ‘mistake’ yielded in terms of the loss of many human lives, the economic losses in the hundreds of billions of dollars that is undermining the US economy, and the loss of political credibility and policy options?  There was either gross negligent political incompetence, or outright deception, to justify a war that was such a huge mistake.  This carries its own consequences on the political scene.

Before its Convention, one of the Republican Party’s top priorities should have been to review the reasons it lost both the House and the Senate during the previous election cycle in November 2006.  This is when the Democrats won a majority of both legislative houses, sending a resounding public message to President Bush’s Administration and the Republican Party, which had dominated before the ‘06 elections. This message, which the Democratic Party adopted, indicated clear dissatisfaction with the ruling Republican Party; however, this did not mean automatic allegiance to the Democrats.  Public opinion polls conducted just before the November 2006 elections showed that a majority of Americans distrust Congress and its members from both political parties.  It is now the ‘Independent voters’, who do not belong to either party but tend to lean towards the Democratic camp, for whom both parties are competing fiercely.

November 4th will be a decisive and important day not just for Americans but for the whole world.  The Bush Administration’s track record and its key supporters in terms of corporate and lobbyist interests and extreme and racially-prejudiced religious movements, have made the upcoming election a choice between the American Constitution or adherence to a number of decaying tribal customs and traditions, and between electing governance on the basis of a healthy concept of citizenship and national participation, or self-enclosure within isolated groups.  It is a choice between hope for a better future for Americans and the world, or the continuation of the Bush Administration’s path which has transformed the ‘American Dream’ into one long nightmare. 

----------------------

*Sobhi Ghandour is the Founder and Director of Alhewar Center (the Arab-American Dialogue Centre) in Washington, D.C. http://www.alhewar.com

 

 
 

Damascus Center for Theoretical and Civil Rights Studies

adress: Varbarega   G101 tel&fax : 004619251237 organisationsnummer : 802433-2218
70351  Örebro -  Sweden E-mail :dccls@bredband.net kontomummer : 8452-5 , 903358349-4